A comprehensive global survey across 68 countries reveals that public trust in scientists remains moderately high post-pandemic. The University of Zurich and ETH Zurich led this study. It included input from 241 researchers. The survey reached over 71,000 participants worldwide.
Principal investigator Viktoria Cologna from ETH Zurich stated, “Our findings highlight that most people, in most countries, trust scientists. They want them actively involved in societal and political matters.”
Contrary to claims of a “crisis of trust in science,” the study found no widespread erosion of confidence. People still trust these organizations.
KEY FINDINGS: A SNAPSHOT OF PUBLIC SENTIMENT
- Global Trust Levels:
- Average trust level scored 3.62 on a 5-point scale, signifying moderately high trust.
- 78% of respondents view scientists as qualified.
- 57% consider them honest, while 56% believe they care about societal well-being.
- Areas of Concern:
- Only 42% of participants feel scientists value public opinions.
- Misalignment exists between public priorities and perceived research focus.
POLARIZATION AND REGIONAL VARIATIONS
While trust in scientists is strong globally, the survey uncovered regional and ideological divides:
- Political Polarization:
- In Western countries, individuals with right-wing views exhibit lower trust in scientists compared to those with left-wing views.
- However, in most regions, trust in science remains unrelated to political affiliation.
- Geographical Variations:
- Trust levels and priorities differ significantly between nations, particularly between developed and Global South countries.
PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS OF SCIENTISTS
The survey highlights a strong demand for scientists to engage more actively with society and policy-making:
- Science Communication:
- 83% of respondents want scientists to share their findings with the public.
- Increased efforts in science communication could bridge existing gaps in understanding.
- Policy Advocacy:
- 52% support greater involvement of scientists in shaping policies.
- Only 23% believe scientists should avoid advocating for specific policies.
RESEARCH PRIORITIES: ALIGNING WITH PUBLIC NEEDS
Participants ranked their preferred research areas, revealing a clear inclination toward societal issues:
- High Priority Areas:
- Public health improvement.
- Energy problem solutions.
- Poverty reduction.
- Lower Priority Areas:
- Defense and military technology development.
The survey underscores a perceived disconnect, with many believing science overemphasizes defense technology at the expense of other critical areas.
A CALL FOR GREATER ENGAGEMENT
Co-author Niels G. Mede from the University of Zurich emphasized, “Scientists need to address these findings. They should be more open to public dialogue. Research priorities must align with societal needs.”
The study suggests that active engagement through communication can strengthen trust. Collaboration can also improve the alignment of scientific endeavors with public expectations.
